Google Now, for instance, is already available for iOS, and while the new third-party integrations are currently Android-only, it’s possible that this could change in the future. Google likely realizes that it can’t ignore this group, which is why we’ve seen so many rumors of Android Wear support coming to iOS. Meanwhile, studies have shown that iPhone users tend to be younger and more affluent, suggesting that they have more money to spend on smartwatches. With the average Android phone costing less than $300, and smartwatch prices starting at $200, chances are that many Android users aren’t going to bother with a smartwatch anytime soon. The Stage Is Set For iOS Supportĭespite these improvements, Android Wear is still held back by the fact that it only works with Android phones. On the developer site where app makers can express interest in the program, Google asks if they have a relevant Wear app for the use case they have in mind. While these voice commands aren’t part of Android Wear yet, that’s clearly going to change. So I’m hoping we start to see them open up the launcher more to different branches of each app,” he says. “I wanted to create an entry in the launcher for our transaction list, and an entry for our spendable view, and I actually wasn’t allowed to do that by the system. Instead, Wear was supposed to deliver information in just the right context, either through app notifications or cards from Google Now.īefore Google announced this feature, Level Money’s Sarazan said this was exactly the kind of thing he was hoping for from Android Wear (though he imagined the controls being available by touch instead of voice). Google’s original vision for Android Wear had little to do with launching apps on your wrist. “Just by virtue of removing the number of taps to get to the app list, that helps a lot,” he says. Aaron Sarazan, who leads Android development for the personal finance app Level Money, says notifications are great for showing a record of recent transactions, but not so much for letting users look up how much they can spend. In the meantime, the launcher will give users easier access to functions that might not come up through notifications alone. “The notification-instead-of-apps model is the future, but people (both users and many app developers) need time to get there.” “My guess is they went a bit too fast going notification-only, and they found users are confused by the lack of structure,” says Q42 developer Taco Ekkel, who created an app for controlling Philips Hue lightbulbs. If I want to capture something on the watch I have to use another app and move it into ticktick on phone or pc if I want to track it.Controlling Philips Hue lightbulbs from Android Wear Other than that it doesn't do anything on the watch (I didn't choose it based on watch integration, it has a lot of other useful features). Things that come due give a notification to the watch where I can mark complete or snooze or dismiss. I actually use a different app ticktick (paid version) to organize my regular todo items. I guess I'd be careful if I was going back and forth between phone and watch to make sure it doesn't get confused and corrupt my data. Two problems I seeġ - the free version does NOT have reminder notifications (you can set a date/time and use that for sorting items that are due, but you won't get a notification when something comes due.Ģ - It seems a little slow to sync changes made on phone back to the watch. You can also access your todoist tasks on phone app, or on the web (with pc) just like for any.do. You can select a list on the phone and use the three dot menu in upper right hand corner and select "Open in Carlyle" (or whatever your watch is) and the list opens on the watch where you can check things off as you go. If you want to use the watch for shopping, todoist seems perfect imo. Todoist looks pretty good, even in the free version.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |